| Title |
Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008696.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kiyomi Shinohara, Mina Honyashiki, Hissei Imai, Vivien Hunot, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Rachel Churchill |
| Abstract |
Behavioural therapies represent one of several categories of psychological therapies that are currently used in the treatment of depression. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of behavioural therapies for depression compared with other psychological therapies remain unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 14% |
| Researcher | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 80 | 17% |
| Unknown | 119 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 137 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 137 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,756,534
of 26,107,981 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,598
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,578
of 225,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.