| Title |
Acupuncture for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008821.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Yang, Jiao Chen, Mingxiao Yang, Siyi Yu, Li Ying, Guan J Liu, Yu‐lan Ren, James M Wright, Fan‐rong Liang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 16% |
| Canada | 7 | 10% |
| Chile | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 74% |
| Scientists | 8 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 279 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 137 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 146 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#660,696
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,155
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,525
of 356,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.