| Title |
Walking for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008823.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling-Ling Lee, Caroline A Mulvaney, Yoko Kin Yoke Wong, Edwin Sy Chan, Michael C Watson, Hui-Hsin Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 42 | 11% |
| Mexico | 24 | 7% |
| Spain | 20 | 5% |
| Canada | 19 | 5% |
| United States | 17 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| South Africa | 8 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 145 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 272 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 45 | 12% |
| Scientists | 37 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 402 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 9% |
| Researcher | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 10% |
| Unknown | 227 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 241 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 347. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#97,033
of 26,051,341 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,082
of 455,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,051,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.