| Title |
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008963.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Féline PB Kroon<sup>a</sup>, Lennart RA van der Burg<sup>a</sup>, Rachelle Buchbinder, Richard H Osborne, Renea V Johnston, Veronica Pitt |
| Abstract |
Self-management education programmes are complex interventions specifically targeted at patient education and behaviour modification. They are designed to encourage people with chronic disease to take an active self-management role to supplement medical care and improve outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 13% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| Canada | 6 | 8% |
| Russia | 4 | 5% |
| Ukraine | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 82% |
| Scientists | 6 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 816 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 805 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 147 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 12% |
| Researcher | 83 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 151 | 19% |
| Unknown | 187 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 259 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 142 | 17% |
| Psychology | 53 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 90 | 11% |
| Unknown | 217 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#579,630
of 25,990,981 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#976
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,968
of 339,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.