| Title |
Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009149.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadja van Ginneken, Weng Yee Chin, Yen Chian Lim, Amin Ussif, Rakesh Singh, Ujala Shahmalak, Marianna Purgato, Antonio Rojas-García, Eleonora Uphoff, Sarah McMullen, Hakan Safaralilo Foss, Ambika Thapa Pachya, Laleh Rashidian, Anna Borghesani, Nicholas Henschke, Lee-Yee Chong, Simon Lewin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| South Africa | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Norway | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 76% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 515 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 10% |
| Researcher | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 14% |
| Unknown | 254 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 10% |
| Psychology | 38 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 8% |
| Unknown | 265 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#883,713
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,619
of 13,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,280
of 441,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.