| Title |
Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009161.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark D Smith, John McCall, Lindsay Plank, G Peter Herbison, Mattias Soop, Jonas Nygren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 595 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 581 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 86 | 14% |
| Researcher | 69 | 12% |
| Other | 50 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 117 | 20% |
| Unknown | 184 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 254 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 8% |
| Unknown | 206 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#883,776
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,622
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,379
of 244,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.