| Title |
Public stewardship of private for‐profit healthcare providers in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009855.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles S Wiysonge, Leila H Abdullahi, Valantine N Ndze, Gregory D Hussey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Congo | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 16% |
| Researcher | 62 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 146 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 160 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,852,060
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,509
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,822
of 369,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.