Title |
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlene J Treanor, Olinda Santin, Gillian Prue, Helen Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter O'Halloran, Michael Donnelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 25% |
Ireland | 5 | 16% |
Germany | 3 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
Scientists | 7 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 563 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 70 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 8% |
Researcher | 46 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 5% |
Other | 105 | 19% |
Unknown | 218 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 15% |
Psychology | 64 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
Unspecified | 18 | 3% |
Other | 58 | 10% |
Unknown | 235 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,349,967
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,884
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,133
of 367,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.