| Title |
Delivery arrangements for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011083.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Agustín Ciapponi, Simon Lewin, Cristian A Herrera, Newton Opiyo, Tomas Pantoja, Elizabeth Paulsen, Gabriel Rada, Charles S Wiysonge, Gabriel Bastías, Lilian Dudley, Signe Flottorp, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Sebastian Garcia Marti, Claire Glenton, Charles I Okwundu, Blanca Peñaloza, Fatima Suleman, Andrew D Oxman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 7% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,672 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1672 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 277 | 17% |
| Researcher | 178 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 151 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 147 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 82 | 5% |
| Other | 284 | 17% |
| Unknown | 553 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 398 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 241 | 14% |
| Psychology | 86 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 83 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 2% |
| Other | 211 | 13% |
| Unknown | 626 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,143,745
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,767
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,355
of 327,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.