| Title |
Implementation strategies for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011086.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomas Pantoja, Newton Opiyo, Simon Lewin, Elizabeth Paulsen, Agustín Ciapponi, Charles S Wiysonge, Cristian A Herrera, Gabriel Rada, Blanca Peñaloza, Lilian Dudley, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Sebastian Garcia Marti, Andrew D Oxman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| Canada | 5 | 12% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| South Africa | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1408 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 230 | 16% |
| Researcher | 153 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 235 | 17% |
| Unknown | 472 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 318 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 215 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 69 | 5% |
| Psychology | 56 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 2% |
| Other | 191 | 14% |
| Unknown | 531 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,218,611
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,418
of 13,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,809
of 327,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.