| Title |
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta‐analysis of individual participant data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011412.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Nevitt, Maria Sudell, Sofia Cividini, Anthony G Marson, Catrin Tudur Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Spain | 6 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 244 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,055,121
of 25,954,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,012
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,681
of 452,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,954,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.