| Title |
Antithrombotic treatment after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012144.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexia Cochrane, Chen Chen, Jacqueline Stephen, Ole Morten Rønning, Craig S Anderson, Graeme J Hankey, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 8 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,102,784
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,327
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,795
of 478,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.