| Title |
Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012203.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aleena M Wojcieszek, Emily Shepherd, Philippa Middleton, Zohra S Lassi, Trish Wilson, Margaret M Murphy, Alexander EP Heazell, David A Ellwood, Robert M Silver, Vicki Flenady |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 33% |
| Australia | 9 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 556 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 11% |
| Researcher | 53 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 16% |
| Unknown | 212 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 13% |
| Psychology | 45 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 10% |
| Unknown | 238 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#964,224
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,784
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,632
of 433,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.