| Title |
Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Todhunter-Brown, Christine Hazelton, Pauline Campbell, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Doreen McClurg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Spain | 7 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 113 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 119 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#890,874
of 25,985,060 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,627
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,431
of 435,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,985,060 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.