| Title |
Interim PET‐results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012643.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela Aldin, Lisa Umlauff, Lise J Estcourt, Gary Collins, Karel Gm Moons, Andreas Engert, Carsten Kobe, Bastian von Tresckow, Madhuri Haque, Farid Foroutan, Nina Kreuzberger, Marialena Trivella, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,336,660
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,702
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,506
of 479,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.