| Title |
Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012701.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver J Schofield‐Robinson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Joanne McPeake, Phil Alderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 20% |
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 575 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 12% |
| Researcher | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 84 | 15% |
| Unknown | 218 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 125 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 19% |
| Psychology | 29 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 9% |
| Unknown | 229 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#940,229
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,738
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,151
of 365,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.