Title |
Work‐break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012886.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tessy Luger, Christopher G Maher, Monika A Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 11 | 14% |
Finland | 7 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
Netherlands | 4 | 5% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 60 | 79% |
Scientists | 8 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 503 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
Student > Master | 51 | 10% |
Researcher | 43 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 5% |
Other | 74 | 15% |
Unknown | 206 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 16% |
Engineering | 19 | 4% |
Psychology | 17 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 16 | 3% |
Other | 66 | 13% |
Unknown | 222 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#892,253
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,638
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,635
of 361,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.