| Title |
Mental Health First Aid as a tool for improving mental health and well‐being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013127.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Richardson, Holly Eve Dale, Lindsay Robertson, Nicholas Meader, George Wellby, Dean McMillan, Rachel Churchill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 43% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 18% |
| Scientists | 14 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#391,237
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#643
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,460
of 360,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.