| Title |
Pharmacy‐based management for depression in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013299.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Nick Walton, Nicholas Meader, Adam Todd, Lisa Ad Webster, Rachel Steele, Stephanie J Sampson, Rachel Churchill, Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, David Ekers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 34% |
| United States | 8 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 373 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 9% |
| Researcher | 33 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 151 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 34 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Psychology | 22 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 164 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#843,644
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,604
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,377
of 481,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.