| Title |
Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013328.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie Bauza, Wenlu Ye, Jiawen Liao, Fiona Majorin, Thomas Clasen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,820,128
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,766
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,297
of 478,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.