| Title |
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013514.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Polly Scutt, Malcolm P Hilton, Amr El Refaie, Derek J Hoare |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 8% |
| Thailand | 2 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,241,492
of 25,983,475 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,471
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,193
of 419,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.