| Title |
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendelien H van der Gaag, Pepijn Ddm Roelofs, Wendy Tm Enthoven, Maurits W van Tulder, Bart W Koes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 10% |
| United States | 14 | 7% |
| Australia | 12 | 6% |
| Spain | 12 | 6% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 140 | 75% |
| Scientists | 25 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 381 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 21% |
| Unknown | 135 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 141 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#309,010
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#505
of 13,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,562
of 389,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.