| Title |
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013650.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takayoshi Kanie, Atsushi Mizuno, Yoshimitsu Takaoka, Takahiro Suzuki, Daisuke Yoneoka, Yuri Nishikawa, Wilson Wai San Tam, Jakub Morze, Andrzej Rynkiewicz, Yiqiao Xin, Olivia Wu, Rui Providencia, Joey Sw Kwong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 20% |
| Japan | 8 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 101 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 106 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#872,162
of 25,996,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,594
of 13,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,391
of 445,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,996,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.