| Title |
Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013706.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Glenton, Benedicte Carlsen, Simon Lewin, Manuela Dominique Wennekes, Brita Askeland Winje, Renske Eilers, on behalf of the VITAL consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Germany | 5 | 11% |
| Belgium | 3 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 301 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 137 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 12% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 150 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,164,622
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,285
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,306
of 448,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.