Title |
Treatments for alopecia areata: a network meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013719.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miriam Mateos-Haro, Monica Novoa-Candia, Guillermo Sánchez Vanegas, Andrea Correa-Pérez, Andrea Gaetano Gil, Silvia Fernández-García, Daniel Ortega-Quijano, Mayra Gizeth Urueña Rodriguez, David Saceda-Corralo, Tayeb Bennouna-Dalero, Lucia Giraldo, Jaqueline Tomlinson, Sergio Vaño-Galván, Javier Zamora |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 22% |
France | 2 | 9% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,481,158
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,032
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,269
of 365,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.