↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013763.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Oostvogels, Stephanie Weibel, Michael Meißner, Peter Kranke, Christine H Meyer-Frießem, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Alexander Schnabel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 25%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Unspecified 6 30%
Psychology 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,757,580
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,729
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,885
of 364,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.