| Title |
Diagnostic test accuracy of telehealth assessment for dementia and mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013786.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny McCleery, Julian Laverty, Terry J Quinn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 211 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 88 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,231,488
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,449
of 13,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,827
of 449,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.