| Title |
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013799.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuji Oba, Sumayya Anwer, Tinashe Maduke, Tarang Patel, Sofia Dias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 68% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,998,203
of 26,067,272 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,120
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,952
of 491,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,067,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.