Title |
Multi‐domain prognostic models used in middle‐aged adults without known cognitive impairment for predicting subsequent dementia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014885.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gopisankar Mohanannair Geethadevi, Terry J Quinn, Johnson George, Kaarin J Anstey, J Simon Bell, Muhammad Rehan Sarwar, Amanda J Cross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 16% |
Australia | 7 | 13% |
Japan | 4 | 7% |
Spain | 3 | 5% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 80% |
Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 57 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 59 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,221,093
of 26,086,865 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,402
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,509
of 395,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,086,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.