| Title |
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015017.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Popp, Miriam Stegemann, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Susan Gould, Peter Kranke, Patrick Meybohm, Nicole Skoetz, Stephanie Weibel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,408 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1055 | 9% |
| United States | 836 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 392 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 279 | 2% |
| France | 224 | 2% |
| Mexico | 223 | 2% |
| Brazil | 208 | 2% |
| Canada | 192 | 2% |
| Colombia | 168 | 1% |
| Other | 1405 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6426 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10363 | 91% |
| Scientists | 472 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 417 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 141 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 385 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 195 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 207 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9885. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#197
of 26,101,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 444,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,101,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.