↓ Skip to main content

Effect of dietary macronutrients on aflatoxicosis: a mini‐review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of dietary macronutrients on aflatoxicosis: a mini‐review
Published in
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/jsfa.8234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zainuddin Nurul Adilah, Sabran Mohd Redzwan

Abstract

Aflatoxin is a toxin produced by Aspergillus species of fungi. The main route of aflatoxin exposure is through the diet. Indeed, the long term aflatoxin exposure is linked to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Aflatoxin causes aflatoxicosis, which can be affected by several factors and it is prevalent in many developing Asian and African countries. This mini review discussed the effects of carbohydrates, fat and protein on aflatoxicosis based on findings from animal and human studies. It was found that high carbohydrate intake enhanced aflatoxicosis occurrence, while low ingestion of carbohydrate with caloric restriction slowed the symptoms associated with aflatoxicosis. Additionally, diets with low protein content worsened the symptoms related to HCC due to aflatoxin exposure. Nevertheless, a study reported that high protein diet favored detoxification of aflatoxin in vivo. There were also conflicting results on the influence of dietary fats as high ingestion of fat enhanced aflatoxicosis development as compared to the low fat diet. Moreover, the types of fat also play a significant role that influence aflatoxin toxicity. In regard to food safety, understanding the influence of macronutrients toward the progression of aflatoxicosis can improve the preventive measures to prevent humans and animals exposure to aflatoxin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Chemistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 17 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,699,002
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
#2,803
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,970
of 315,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.