↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Krüippel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, October 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
16 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
952 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Krüippel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein
Published in
Cell, October 1991
DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90189-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Shi, Edward Seto, Long-Sheng Chang, Thomas Shenk

Abstract

A sequence within the transcription control region of the adeno-associated virus P5 promoter has been shown to mediate transcriptional activation by the adenovirus E1A protein. We report here that this same element mediates transcriptional repression in the absence of E1A. Two cellular proteins have been found to bind to overlapping regions within this sequence element. One of these proteins, YY1, is responsible for the repression. E1A relieves repression exerted by YY1 and further activates transcription through its binding site. A YY1-specific cDNA has been isolated. Its sequence reveals YY1 to be a zinc finger protein that belongs to the GLI-Krüppel gene family. The product of the cDNA binds to YY1 sites. When fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, it is capable of repressing transcription directed by a promoter that contains GAL4-binding sites, and E1A proteins can relieve the repression and activate transcription through the fusion protein.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 24%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Professor 9 4%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,758
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#6,740
of 17,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#620
of 16,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#5
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.