↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of vaccine efficacy must be based on good clinical data–Authors’ reply

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of vaccine efficacy must be based on good clinical data–Authors’ reply
Published in
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, February 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nur Asheila Abdul Taib, Dhesi Baha Raja, Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Timothy William, Arvinder-Singh HS, Siti Aisah Mokhtar, Choo-Yee Ting, Wei Aun Yap, Michelle Yoon Kim Chan, Lidwina Edwin Amir

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,925,391
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,087
of 455,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them