↓ Skip to main content

A missing link in the transformation from asymmetric to symmetric metallofullerene cages implies a top-down fullerene formation mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A missing link in the transformation from asymmetric to symmetric metallofullerene cages implies a top-down fullerene formation mechanism
Published in
Nature Chemistry, September 2013
DOI 10.1038/nchem.1748
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianyuan Zhang, Faye L. Bowles, Daniel W. Bearden, W. Keith Ray, Tim Fuhrer, Youqing Ye, Caitlyn Dixon, Kim Harich, Richard F. Helm, Marilyn M. Olmstead, Alan L. Balch, Harry C. Dorn

Abstract

Although fullerenes were discovered nearly three decades ago, the mechanism of their formation remains a mystery. Many versions of the classic 'bottom-up' formation mechanism have been advanced, starting with C2 units that build up to form chains and rings of carbon atoms and ultimately form those well-known isolated fullerenes (for example, I(h)-C60). In recent years, evidence from laboratory and interstellar observations has emerged to suggest a 'top-down' mechanism, whereby small isolated fullerenes are formed via shrinkage of giant fullerenes generated from graphene sheets. Here, we present molecular structural evidence for this top-down mechanism based on metal carbide metallofullerenes M2C2@C1(51383)-C84 (M = Y, Gd). We propose that the unique asymmetric C1(51383)-C84 cage with destabilizing fused pentagons is a preserved 'missing link' in the top-down mechanism, and in well-established rearrangement steps can form many well-known, high-symmetry fullerene structures that account for the majority of solvent-extractable metallofullerenes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 27 50%
Materials Science 9 17%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#453,261
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#321
of 3,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,657
of 202,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.