↓ Skip to main content

Self-healing chemistry enables the stable operation of silicon microparticle anodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
18 X users
patent
25 patents
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1042 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
854 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-healing chemistry enables the stable operation of silicon microparticle anodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries
Published in
Nature Chemistry, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nchem.1802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Wang, Hui Wu, Zheng Chen, Matthew T. McDowell, Yi Cui, Zhenan Bao

Abstract

The ability to repair damage spontaneously, which is termed self-healing, is an important survival feature in nature because it increases the lifetime of most living creatures. This feature is highly desirable for rechargeable batteries because the lifetime of high-capacity electrodes, such as silicon anodes, is shortened by mechanical fractures generated during the cycling process. Here, inspired by nature, we apply self-healing chemistry to silicon microparticle (SiMP) anodes to overcome their short cycle-life. We show that anodes made from low-cost SiMPs (~3-8 µm), for which stable deep galvanostatic cycling was previously impossible, can now have an excellent cycle life when coated with a self-healing polymer. We attain a cycle life ten times longer than state-of-art anodes made from SiMPs and still retain a high capacity (up to ~3,000 mA h g(-1)). Cracks and damage in the coating during cycling can be healed spontaneously by the randomly branched hydrogen-bonding polymer used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 854 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 828 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 246 29%
Researcher 135 16%
Student > Master 103 12%
Student > Bachelor 68 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 99 12%
Unknown 152 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 255 30%
Materials Science 187 22%
Engineering 105 12%
Chemical Engineering 41 5%
Energy 28 3%
Other 54 6%
Unknown 184 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#173,796
of 24,403,034 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#57
of 3,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,507
of 312,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,403,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.