You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.3145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert A Koeth, Zeneng Wang, Bruce S Levison, Jennifer A Buffa, Elin Org, Brendan T Sheehy, Earl B Britt, Xiaoming Fu, Yuping Wu, Lin Li, Jonathan D Smith, Joseph A DiDonato, Jun Chen, Hongzhe Li, Gary D Wu, James D Lewis, Manya Warrier, J Mark Brown, Ronald M Krauss, W H Wilson Tang, Frederic D Bushman, Aldons J Lusis, Stanley L Hazen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 422 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 7% |
| Spain | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 16 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 179 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 299 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 67 | 16% |
| Scientists | 50 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,821 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2727 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 484 | 17% |
| Researcher | 462 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 330 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 320 | 11% |
| Other | 173 | 6% |
| Other | 515 | 18% |
| Unknown | 537 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 596 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 536 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 409 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 123 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 3% |
| Other | 429 | 15% |
| Unknown | 643 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1083. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,376
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#139
of 9,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 213,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#1
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.