↓ Skip to main content

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
564 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1219361110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian S. Mautz, Bob B. M. Wong, Richard A. Peters, Michael D. Jennions

Abstract

Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male's relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory female mate choice based on male genital traits. Before clothing, the nonretractable human penis would have been conspicuous to potential mates. This observation has generated suggestions that human penis size partly evolved because of female choice. Here we show, based upon female assessment of digitally projected life-size, computer-generated images, that penis size interacts with body shape and height to determine male sexual attractiveness. Positive linear selection was detected for penis size, but the marginal increase in attractiveness eventually declined with greater penis size (i.e., quadratic selection). Penis size had a stronger effect on attractiveness in taller men than in shorter men. There was a similar increase in the positive effect of penis size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans. More broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of genital traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 492 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 4%
Germany 12 2%
Spain 5 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 27 5%
Unknown 475 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 24%
Researcher 118 21%
Student > Master 62 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 32 6%
Other 109 19%
Unknown 62 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 38%
Psychology 54 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 7%
Chemistry 22 4%
Environmental Science 18 3%
Other 134 24%
Unknown 79 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 974. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,182
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#531
of 103,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74
of 213,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.