↓ Skip to main content

A genomic case study of mixed fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A genomic case study of mixed fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Annals of Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdw135
Pubmed ID
Authors

O.L. Griffith, M. Griffith, K. Krysiak, V. Magrini, A. Ramu, Z.L. Skidmore, J. Kunisaki, R. Austin, S. McGrath, J. Zhang, R. Demeter, T. Graves, J.M. Eldred, J. Walker, D.E. Larson, C.A. Maher, Y. Lin, W. Chapman, A. Mahadevan, R. Miksad, I. Nasser, D.W. Hanto, E.R. Mardis

Abstract

We report the first comprehensive study of a case of metastatic mixed fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (mFL-HCC) by exome and transcriptome sequencing. We found no evidence for HBV or HCV expression or genome integration,TERTpromoter mutations or other common HCC-associated mutations. The very low mutation rate of this case, large number of mostly single-copy, long-range copy number variant events, and high expression ofERBB2were more consistent with previous reports of pure FL-HCC than conventional HCC. In particular, a recently discovered fusion transcript specifically associated with pure FL-HCC and involvingDNAJB1andPRKACAwas detected at very high expression levels. Subsequent analysis of the primary tumor and additional metastases revealed the presence of this fusion in all assayed samples, including samples with mixed or conventional HCC pathology. A novel BAC-capture approach was developed to allow identification of a 400kb deletion as the underlying genomic mechanism for the fusion. A second case of mFL-HCC confirmed our finding that theDNAJB1:PRKACAfusion was detectable in conventional components. Finally, we used sensitive detection methods to screen an additional 112 HCC and 44 adjacent non-tumor liver samples for this fusion and identified a single case of HCC, which upon review, also had both conventional and fibrolamellar features. These results indicate that theDNAJB1:PRKACAfusion can be used as a diagnostic tool for both pure and mFL-HCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#3,413
of 7,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,736
of 315,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#61
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.