↓ Skip to main content

Case-control investigation on the risk factors of melioidosis in small ruminant farms in Peninsular Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Microbiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case-control investigation on the risk factors of melioidosis in small ruminant farms in Peninsular Malaysia
Published in
Journal of Applied Microbiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/jam.12830
Pubmed ID
Authors

H.I. Musa, L. Hassan, Z.H. Shamsuddin, C. Panchadcharam, Z. Zakaria, S. Abdul Aziz, R.F.N. Rachmat

Abstract

Epidemiology of melioidosis is poorly understood because its occurrence is influenced by complex interaction of environmental, climatic, physicochemical and host factors. We investigated the potential risk factors for exposure to Burkholderia pseudomallei in small ruminants farms in Peninsular Malaysia. Melioidosis-positive (n=33) and negative (n=27) farms were selected and visited for interviews and environmental samples collection. The characteristics and putative disease risk factors were compared between the case and the control farms using Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of melioidosis were significantly higher in farms that had bush clearing around farms (odds ratio [OR]=6.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-38.84, p=0.037), in farms with B. pseudomallei present in the soil (OR=6.23, 95%CI=1.03-37.68, p=0.046), in farms that have other animal species present (OR=7.96, 95%CI=1.14-55.99, p=0.037) and in farms that had flooding or waterlogging conditions (OR=11.95, 95%CI=1.39-102.6, p=0.024) when compared to the odds of the disease in farms that did not have the above conditions. The odds of the disease in farms that treated their soils with lime were significantly lower (OR=0.028, 95%CI=0.003-0.29, p=0.003) compared to the odds in those that did not. The risk factors for exposure to B. pseudomallei highlighted above may have contributed to the occurrence of melioidosis in animals in the study farms. Information from the study may be helpful in planning control measures against melioidosis and have improved understanding of the epidemiology of the disease in livestock farms. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,679,539
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Microbiology
#46
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,869
of 282,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Microbiology
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.