↓ Skip to main content

Genomic characterisation of the effector complement of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic characterisation of the effector complement of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-923
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida has biotrophic interactions with its host. The nematode induces a feeding structure - the syncytium - which it keeps alive for the duration of the life cycle and on which it depends for all nutrients required to develop to the adult stage. Interactions of G. pallida with the host are mediated by effectors, which are produced in two sets of gland cells. These effectors suppress host defences, facilitate migration and induce the formation of the syncytium.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,063,490
of 34,408,222 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,202
of 12,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,513
of 307,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#53
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,408,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.