You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review on risk factors for khat chewing among adolescents in the African continent and Arabian Peninsula
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0263372 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Osman Abubakar Fiidow, Halimatus Sakdiah Minhat, Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli, Norliza Ahmad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,813,815
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,743
of 201,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,990
of 513,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#918
of 3,967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.