You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mortality in Iraq Associated with the 2003–2011 War and Occupation: Findings from a National Cluster Sample Survey by the University Collaborative Iraq Mortality Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Hagopian, Abraham D. Flaxman, Tim K. Takaro, Sahar A. Esa Al Shatari, Julie Rajaratnam, Stan Becker, Alison Levin-Rector, Lindsay Galway, Berq J. Hadi Al-Yasseri, William M. Weiss, Christopher J. Murray, Gilbert Burnham |
| Abstract |
Previous estimates of mortality in Iraq attributable to the 2003 invasion have been heterogeneous and controversial, and none were produced after 2006. The purpose of this research was to estimate direct and indirect deaths attributable to the war in Iraq between 2003 and 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 479 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 8% |
| Australia | 14 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 12 | 3% |
| France | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Ireland | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 14% |
| Unknown | 223 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 399 | 83% |
| Scientists | 37 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 17% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,512
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#26
of 5,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30
of 224,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.