↓ Skip to main content

Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
9 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
68 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
6 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
20 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather A. Piwowar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 31 10%
Spain 7 2%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Netherlands 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
Australia 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 243 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 22%
Librarian 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 14%
Student > Master 32 10%
Other 26 8%
Other 70 21%
Unknown 28 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 78 24%
Computer Science 67 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 7%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 39 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#324,728
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,602
of 224,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,081
of 129,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#37
of 2,170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.