↓ Skip to main content

Mentee Missteps: Tales From the Academic Trenches

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
734 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mentee Missteps: Tales From the Academic Trenches
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2017
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.12384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Vaughn, Sanjay Saint, Vineet Chopra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 734 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Professor 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 49%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 478. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#57,030
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,110
of 36,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,288
of 426,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#38
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.