You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ganesh M. Babulal, Yakeel T. Quiroz, Benedict C. Albensi, Eider Arenaza‐Urquijo, Arlene J. Astell, Claudio Babiloni, Alex Bahar‐Fuchs, Joanne Bell, Gene L. Bowman, Adam M. Brickman, Gaël Chételat, Carrie Ciro, Ann D. Cohen, Peggye Dilworth‐Anderson, Hiroko H. Dodge, Simone Dreux, Steven Edland, Anna Esbensen, Lisbeth Evered, Michael Ewers, Keith N. Fargo, Juan Fortea, Hector Gonzalez, Deborah R. Gustafson, Elizabeth Head, James A. Hendrix, Scott M. Hofer, Leigh A. Johnson, Roos Jutten, Kerry Kilborn, Krista L. Lanctôt, Jennifer J. Manly, Ralph N. Martins, Michelle M. Mielke, Martha Clare Morris, Melissa E. Murray, Esther S. Oh, Mario A. Parra, Robert A. Rissman, Catherine M. Roe, Octavio A. Santos, Nikolaos Scarmeas, Lon S. Schneider, Nicole Schupf, Sietske Sikkes, Heather M. Snyder, Hamid R. Sohrabi, Yaakov Stern, Andre Strydom, Yi Tang, Graciela Muniz Terrera, Charlotte Teunissen, Debora Melo van Lent, Michael Weinborn, Linda Wesselman, Donna M. Wilcock, Henrik Zetterberg, Sid E. O'Bryant, Alzheimer's Association on behalf of the International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 67% |
| Scientists | 8 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 463 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 93 | 20% |
| Unknown | 154 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 12% |
| Psychology | 50 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 178 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 379. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#83,891
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#71
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,586
of 447,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.