You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1563-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Humsa S. Venkatesh, Wade Morishita, Anna C. Geraghty, Dana Silverbush, Shawn M. Gillespie, Marlene Arzt, Lydia T. Tam, Cedric Espenel, Anitha Ponnuswami, Lijun Ni, Pamelyn J. Woo, Kathryn R. Taylor, Amit Agarwal, Aviv Regev, David Brang, Hannes Vogel, Shawn Hervey-Jumper, Dwight E. Bergles, Mario L. Suvà, Robert C. Malenka, Michelle Monje |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 610 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 213 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 7% |
| Spain | 23 | 4% |
| Canada | 19 | 3% |
| Germany | 17 | 3% |
| Australia | 15 | 2% |
| Japan | 11 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 1% |
| France | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 61 | 10% |
| Unknown | 194 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 357 | 59% |
| Scientists | 203 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,072 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1072 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 180 | 17% |
| Researcher | 171 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 5% |
| Other | 158 | 15% |
| Unknown | 318 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 202 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 178 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 7% |
| Engineering | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 123 | 11% |
| Unknown | 362 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 860. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,302
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,083
of 98,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#419
of 354,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#56
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.