↓ Skip to main content

Common Errors in Ecological Data Sharing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of eScience Librarianship, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Common Errors in Ecological Data Sharing
Published in
Journal of eScience Librarianship, January 2013
DOI 10.7191/jeslib.2013.1024
Authors

Karina Kervin, William Michener, Robert Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 15%
Spain 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 10 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 23%
Computer Science 13 21%
Social Sciences 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,921,984
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Journal of eScience Librarianship
#63
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,196
of 284,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of eScience Librarianship
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.