Title |
Common Errors in Ecological Data Sharing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of eScience Librarianship, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.7191/jeslib.2013.1024 |
Authors |
Karina Kervin, William Michener, Robert Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 15% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 17 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 14 | 23% |
Computer Science | 13 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,921,984
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Journal of eScience Librarianship
#63
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,196
of 284,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of eScience Librarianship
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.