You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Special Medical Physics Consult Process for Reirradiation Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Radiation Oncology , June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.adro.2019.05.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly C Paradis, Charles Mayo, Dawn Owen, Daniel E Spratt, Jason Hearn, Benjamin Rosen, Rojano Kashani, Jean Moran, Daniel S Tatro, Whitney Beeler, Karen Vineberg, Dylan C Smith, Martha M Matuszak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 22% |
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 67% |
| Scientists | 12 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 34% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,238,138
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Radiation Oncology
#24
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,310
of 368,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Radiation Oncology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.