You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Super‐Utilizer” Interventions: What They Reveal About Evaluation Research, Wishful Thinking, and Health Equity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Milbank Quarterly, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-0009.12449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
PAULA M. LANTZ |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 56% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 48% |
| Scientists | 28 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#628,902
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Milbank Quarterly
#104
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,114
of 469,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Milbank Quarterly
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.