| Title |
Social Media and Physicians’ Online Identity Crisis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2013.8238 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew DeCamp, Thomas W. Koenig, Margaret S. Chisolm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 82 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Canada | 14 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 2 | <1% |
| Thailand | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 22% |
| Scientists | 32 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 33% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#207,983
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,864
of 36,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,337
of 208,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.